Updated January 31, 2026
TL;DR: HireVue dominates enterprise video interviewing with AI-powered assessments and compliance certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP), starting at $35,000 annually. Harver specialises in high-volume matching for hourly roles, having processed 100M+ candidates with gamified assessments. Both excel in their niches but force trade-offs. HireVue candidates report impersonal experiences. Harver assessments take 30 minutes to several hours. More critically, both typically operate on per-candidate or per-hire pricing that penalises organisations for widening talent funnels and creates budget unpredictability. Neither offers true platform unification. You still need separate tools for psychometric assessments, video interviews, and virtual assessment centres. For UK enterprises running volume hiring (200-5,000+ hires annually), unified platforms eliminate fragmentation while providing success-aligned pricing models that remove artificial constraints forcing CV screening over skills-based assessment.
Quick Verdict
For enterprise professional hiring with existing assessment tools, HireVue delivers proven video scale backed by extensive compliance certifications. For retail and contact centre volume matching, Harver excels with engaging gamified assessments. For unified skills-based hiring combining psychometric assessments, video interviews, and virtual assessment centres without per-candidate cost penalties, unified platforms eliminate the tool sprawl and budget unpredictability forcing trade-offs between broad evaluation and cost control.
At a Glance: The Core Difference Between HireVue and Harver
HireVue and Harver solve fundamentally different hiring challenges. HireVue pioneered digital interviewing in 2004 and evolved into a comprehensive hiring intelligence solution serving more than 700 major clients worldwide, including nearly half of the Fortune 100. The platform validates candidate skills through video interviewing, AI-powered assessments, and conversational AI, focusing on enterprise professional roles.
Harver addresses volume hiring pain points. The platform combines predictive assessments, matching algorithms, and automation to fill high-volume roles in retail, BPOs, contact centres, and seasonal industries. Having processed over 100 million candidates, Harver acts as a talent matching system that reveals cognitive ability, behavioural traits, and job readiness, then matches candidates to role profiles within minutes.
Table 1: Core Positioning
Your platform choice narrows to a fundamental question: Do you need video interviewing scale for professional roles or volume matching for hourly positions? However, this binary choice creates a larger problem. Both are point solutions requiring additional tools for complete assessment programmes, fragmenting data and inflating costs.
Feature Comparison: Video Interviewing vs. Talent Matching
HireVue's Enterprise Video Platform
HireVue's on-demand and live video interviews streamline hiring with real-time evaluation tools, interview guides, automated candidate routing, and shareable recordings. The platform includes AI-powered assessments with game-based evaluations, virtual job tryouts, technical tests, and language proficiency assessments.
CodeVue technical assessments provide coding challenges validated by Industrial-Organisational Psychologists. Conversational AI accelerates offers with 24/7 engagement, matching talent to roles. JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Bain, BCG, Deloitte, and Amazon use HireVue for graduate hiring and analyst screening. The platform's workflow automation provides smooth ATS integration with existing hiring systems.
Harver's Volume Matching Engine
Harver's assessment library contains over 450 options across dozens of languages, evaluating candidates based on work behaviours, abilities, skills, tools, and preferences. The suite includes behavioural assessments (traditional and gamified), cognitive reasoning, job-specific skills tests, realistic job previews, and remote work diagnostics.
The platform's proprietary self-learning algorithm analyses every candidate to produce a matching suitability score based on predicted potential for successful hire. Harver's automation capabilities streamline hiring with customisable automation that progresses qualified candidates based on your criteria, reducing decision time dramatically.
In 2022, Harver acquired Pymetrics, integrating gamified neuroscience-based assessments especially suited for customer service and call centre positions. Harver's retail customers typically hire more than 3,000 candidates per year, with the platform optimising hourly and professional high-volume hiring for call centres, retail, healthcare, financial services, and manufacturing.
Assessment Validity and Bias Mitigation
HireVue's Text-Only AI Methodology
HireVue video assessments analyse only the transcript of responses, focusing on how candidates describe their experiences and past actions related to key job competencies. The platform removed facial analysis after discovering nonverbal data provided minimal predictive power (contributing 0.25% to model accuracy in most cases, 4% even for customer-facing roles).
Both HireVue data and algorithms undergo audits to check for bias. The mitigation process includes removing factors proven to contribute to biased results, retraining models, and iterating until adverse impact is addressed. HireVue offers Multi-Penalty Optimization, simultaneously incentivising algorithms to predict job-related competencies while penalising them for demographic group differences.
HireVue deploys AI Assessments that are static and deterministic, meaning algorithms provide repeatable output each time used rather than learning on the fly. Building on learnings from over 70 million interviews, the algorithms identify job-specific skills, behaviours, and competencies while ignoring irrelevant factors.
A third-party audit by O'Neil Risk Consulting and Algorithmic Auditing (ORCAA) examined HireVue's assessments, though the audit was narrowly focused on specific use cases. HireVue's transparency commitments include publishing proprietary information, a significant departure from traditional industry standards of protecting intellectual property.
Harver's Predictive Validation Approach
Harver employs Subject Matter Expert validation of job profiles and assessments, mitigates bias with data-driven hiring decisions, and optimises matching over time through performance feedback loops. The platform provides custom algorithms determined in collaboration with I/O consultants.
By automating candidate screening and matching, Harver reduces time-to-hire by around 40% and decreases early attrition by up to 25%, using real-time analytics and validated assessments to accelerate decisions without sacrificing quality. Harver assessments are built and tested to be unbiased, allowing organisations to support DEI initiatives while standardising hiring processes.
The Transparency Gap
Both vendors claim to mitigate bias, but your Legal team demands transparent methodologies over proprietary algorithms. HireVue's public audit results provide more defensibility than Harver's general claims about "unbiased assessments." However, neither platform matches the transparency of traditional psychometric assessments with published validation studies using peer-reviewed methodologies showing meaningful relationships with performance outcomes. UK and European employment tribunals expect this standard when you defend selection decisions.
Integration and Enterprise Scalability
HireVue's Certified ATS Partnerships
HireVue holds Workday Select Partner status with pre-built certified integration supporting 140+ customers. The platform is a SAP Silver Partner with 50+ SuccessFactors integrations and Oracle Gold Partner with 100+ ORC and Taleo customers. Deep compatibility extends to Greenhouse, SmartRecruiters, and other major enterprise ATS platforms through native connectors.
Integration depth enables skipping CV reviews and phone screens with one-click interview assessments embedded directly in SAP, creating a single automated system of record without juggling tools or performing manual updates.
Harver's Partnership Breadth
Harver has partnered with over 30 of the top ATS and HRIS providers, including SAP SuccessFactors, iCIMS, Workday and Oracle. The platform integrates with iCIMS Hire, SmartRecruiters, Jobvite, and Greenhouse, automatically pushing candidate assessment data, matching scores, and workflow updates into ATS platforms.
However, Harver does not publicly provide detailed customer counts or partnership tier status that HireVue discloses. The company emphasises partnership breadth rather than specific deployment numbers.
The Integration Reality Check
Both platforms claim "seamless" ATS integration, but implementation requires configuration, field mapping, and testing (typically 1-2 weeks for standard deployments). Native connectors work, but the difference between "supported" and "effective" integration matters when your team's administrative burden prevents strategic talent work.
Candidate Experience and Ease of Use
HireVue: Flexibility with Impersonality Trade-Offs
Candidates who passed initial screeners appreciated completing interviews on their own time. Virtual and OnDemand interviews allow candidates to interview anytime, anywhere. Every candidate receives the same questions, reducing potential biases arising in traditional interviews.
However, automated one-way video interviews may feel impersonal. Talking to a screen instead of a real person can feel cold, potentially impacting how candidates express themselves. Reviews note occasional technical issues, limited candidate support, and poor follow-up. Some organisations lost qualified candidates unwilling to complete videos, adding friction to the application experience.
HireVue is generally user-friendly for both recruiters and candidates, with a clean, intuitive interface making it easy to set up interviews and review responses.
Harver: Engagement with Duration Concerns
Harver prioritises positive candidate experience with short, engaging, mobile-friendly assessments. Gamified tasks, realistic job previews, and clear expectations help candidates stay motivated and informed, reducing drop-off rates and strengthening employer brand.
Candidates appreciate learning about the position and company culture while completing assessments. Those reaching later rounds arrive motivated and prepared, already understanding company culture and role requirements. However, assessment length varies from 30 minutes to several hours depending on job complexity.
On G2, Harver has accumulated 171+ reviews with an average 4.6/5 rating, proving particularly useful for large applicant volumes.
Pricing Models and ROI: The Hidden Costs of Per-Candidate Fees
HireVue's Published Tiers
HireVue offers tiered pricing models. The Essential package starts at $35,000 annually for companies with 2,500-7,500 employees. Enterprise packages provide more comprehensive features with custom pricing. Like most SaaS enterprise software, HireVue's pricing is complex and varies based on products chosen (video interviewing alone, video with assessments, game-based assessments, CodeVue technical tests) and hiring volume.
HireVue uses credit-based pricing where assessing more candidates increases costs. This creates a fundamental conflict: assessment science tells you to evaluate broadly to identify hidden talent, but your budget incentivises narrow filtering. When assessing 2,000 contact centre applicants at traditional per-candidate rates, the maths becomes prohibitive.
Harver's Custom Model
Harver operates on custom pricing with no publicly listed prices. Harver's retail customers typically hire more than 3,000 candidates per year. The pricing structure supports rapid, high-volume processing, but specific costs remain opaque until sales engagement.
The Real Cost: Budget Unpredictability
Both platforms create budget risk through variable pricing models. When your graduate programme applicant pool doubles or triples unexpectedly, per-candidate pricing forces impossible choices: exceed budget substantially or screen most candidates by CV alone, perpetuating bias and missing talent. This artificial constraint (paying more to assess more candidates) contradicts the fundamental principle of skills-based hiring: evaluate everyone fairly based on job-relevant capabilities.
The Third Option: Why Unified Assessment Platforms Change the Equation
Choosing between HireVue and Harver presents a false dichotomy. Selecting "video interviewing tool" versus "volume matching platform" addresses a symptom (tool selection) rather than the root problem: fragmented recruitment technology creating data silos, operational complexity, and cost inefficiency.
Sova's Unified Platform Architecture
Sova consolidates psychometric assessments, video interviews, and virtual assessment centres into one candidate journey, eliminating the tool sprawl forcing TA teams to spend disproportionate time on administration. The platform delivers cognitive ability, personality, motivation, skills, and judgement assessment with actionable intelligence flowing to ATS and hiring managers automatically.
Candidates complete validated psychometric assessments measuring cognitive ability, personality traits, and competencies, followed by structured video interviews within the same platform. Results flow automatically to your ATS, triggering workflow steps without manual intervention.
Structured Video Interviewing with Transparent Scoring
Unlike HireVue's proprietary AI or Harver's matching algorithms, Sova's video interview scoring uses scientifically designed rubrics ensuring consistent evaluation. Assessors receive clear competency frameworks derived from job analysis, not black-box predictions.
The Video Interview Builder allows configuring one-way recorded or two-way Teams-integrated interviews, with scoring providing data for hiring manager decisions rather than algorithmic verdicts.
"Customer support is excellent, offering prompt assistance with technical issues." - Nagma S on G2
Automated Workflows Eliminating Administrative Burden
The platform's automated candidate workflow triggers next steps when candidates complete assessments. No manual link sending, no candidate chasing, no spreadsheet updates.
Results flow to three places simultaneously: Sova dashboard (candidates ranked by score with individual competencies, filterable and exportable), ATS (automated status updates and advancement workflows), and hiring manager reports in plain language.
"Setting up Sova assessments and online exercises proves effective in getting quality candidates." - Palak G on G2
Compliance Arsenal for Legal Defensibility
ISO 27001 certification, annual adverse impact reporting, and published validation studies provide the evidence your Legal team needs when defending selection processes. Unlike proprietary algorithms requiring trust in vendor claims, Sova delivers documentation showing assessments measure job-relevant competencies through peer-reviewed methodologies demonstrating meaningful relationships with performance outcomes.
The platform's adverse impact reporting monitors fairness across demographics with documented analysis, addressing the compliance gap forcing organisations to settle tribunal claims. GDPR compliance and UK/EU data residency eliminate the retrofitted compliance characterising US-based competitors.
Pricing That Removes Artificial Constraints
Rather than per-candidate fees creating conflict between assessing broadly and controlling costs, Sova's engagement framework aligns pricing with hiring success. Initial scoping establishes a baseline estimation that scales dynamically based on actual hiring volume, candidate pool evaluation size, and scope refinements throughout the engagement.
This approach transforms the economics of skills-based hiring. When your applicant pool unexpectedly doubles, your assessment capacity expands without budget catastrophe. When you want to assess all applicants rather than screening most by CV, your cost remains predictable. The framework removes the artificial constraint forcing organisations to choose between budget adherence and fair evaluation.
"The platform itself is amazing and the potential it hosts is also remarkable. The online assessments, the managing of applicants as well as assessors is smooth." - Palak G on G2
"Flexibility, communication, product features, expertise, candidate experience. The product roadmap is clear and there are exciting improvements coming soon." - Verified user on G2
Final Verdict: Choosing the Right Tool for Your Volume Hiring
HireVue is useful if your primary need is enterprise video interviewing for professional roles at Fortune 500 scale, you value public compliance documentation (SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP), your organisation already uses separate assessment tools for psychometrics, and you can absorb per-candidate pricing variability.
Harver is a strong option if you exclusively hire high-volume hourly roles in retail, contact centres, or seasonal positions, matching algorithms suit your straightforward role requirements, and engaging gamified assessments justify longer assessment duration.
Sova provides a unified platform if you need defensible multi-method assessment combining psychometrics and video interviewing, you run volume hiring programmes (200-5,000+ hires annually) where per-candidate pricing becomes prohibitive, your ATS integration must work reliably, Legal demands transparent validation methodologies, or you measure success by first-year attrition reduction rather than time-to-hire alone.
Platform fragmentation created by point solutions (juggling assessment vendor, video platform, and virtual assessment centre scheduling) represents the hidden cost rarely appearing in initial business cases.
Key Considerations for Your Decision
Volume & Budget Predictability: Calculate total cost over three years at your actual hiring volume, including overage scenarios when applicant pools spike 2-3× above forecast.
Integration Reality: Request sandbox testing in your actual Workday, Greenhouse, or SuccessFactors environment, not generic demos. Verify field mapping works and data flows automatically.
Legal Defensibility: Ask vendors for published validation studies showing job-relevance, adverse impact analysis capabilities, and tribunal defence documentation, not just compliance checkboxes.
Platform Consolidation: Map current tool sprawl (assessment vendor + video platform + scheduling tool + ATS) against unified alternatives. Calculate admin time saved eliminating CSV exports and manual reconciliation.
Candidate Experience: Test your actual assessment journey on mobile devices with realistic constraints (commute connection speeds, small screens, time pressure). Measure completion rates, not just vendor promises.
Book a Sova platform demo to see unified assessment, video interviewing, and virtual assessment centre capabilities in one workflow, or explore detailed migration guidance from HireVue to unified platforms.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between HireVue and Harver?
HireVue specialises in enterprise video interviewing with AI assessments for professional roles, serving Fortune 500 clients. Harver focuses on volume matching for hourly roles in retail, BPO, and contact centres using predictive algorithms.
Do HireVue and Harver integrate with Workday?
Yes. HireVue is a Workday Select Partner with 140+ live customers and certified integration. Harver partners with Workday among 30+ ATS providers.
How does Sova compare to HireVue for video interviewing?
Sova unifies psychometric assessments, video interviews, and virtual assessment centres in one platform with transparent structured scoring rubrics, while HireVue specialises in video interviewing requiring separate tools for comprehensive psychometric assessment. Sova operates on success-aligned pricing rather than per-candidate fees.
What are the typical costs for HireVue?
HireVue's Essential package starts at $35,000 annually for companies with 2,500-7,500 employees. Enterprise packages provide more comprehensive features with custom pricing. Costs increase with usage due to credit-based models.
How long do Harver assessments take to complete?
Harver assessment length varies from 30 minutes to several hours depending on job complexity and number of assessments used.


.png)

.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)