5 Best Skill Assessment Platforms For Hiring High-Performing Teams

Your bad hires cost more than wasted salary. When 40% of your new hires leave within twelve months, you face team disruption, manager burnout, and lost productivity. You make these expensive mistakes because you rely on CV screening and gut-feel interviews, both achieving near-zero ability to predict actual job performance (r=0.18 for CV experience, r=0.10 for education).

You need scientific assessment platforms measuring the cognitive ability, personality traits, and situational judgment that correlate with success. However, choosing the wrong platform creates new problems: compliance black boxes your Legal team cannot defend, per-candidate pricing restricting who you assess, or fragmented tools multiplying administrative burden.

This guide compares the five platforms improving enterprise hiring in 2025, examining which solution fits your specific hiring volume, compliance requirements, and operational constraints.

Why enterprise hiring needs validated skill assessments

When you use CV screening, you exclude candidates with actual potential while advancing those who simply attended target institutions. In contrast, general mental ability tests achieve r=0.51, and structured interviews combined with cognitive assessment reach r=0.63.

UK organisations face average employee turnover of 34%, with poor assessment quality contributing directly to this attrition. The legal exposure compounds financial damage. Unstructured interviews and CV screening create indirect discrimination under the UK Equality Act 2010 when they disadvantage protected groups without demonstrating job relevance.

Scientifically validated assessments address both problems. They improve hiring quality through instruments validated against actual job performance while providing the compliance documentation your Legal team requires when selection decisions face scrutiny.

Criteria for selecting a talent assessment platform

Your selection requires evaluating five decision factors that determine whether the solution improves hiring quality while reducing operational risk.

Scientific validity and legal defensibility

You need platforms measuring competencies that actually predict job success, not superficial traits. Demand validation studies demonstrating correlation coefficients above r=0.30, preferably r=0.40 or higher, between assessment scores and 6-12 month performance data.

Certification under internationally recognized standards like ISO 27001 demonstrates that security controls meet rigorous requirements for information security management. GDPR compliance requires documented data processing agreements, EU data residency options, and clear candidate consent mechanisms. For organisations assessing 1,000+ candidates annually, annual adverse impact reporting provides evidence that your process does not create disparate impact on protected groups.

Ask vendors for their validation studies, not marketing claims about "AI-powered" assessment.

Integration depth and automation

Fragmented systems create the administrative burden consuming your team's capacity. When assessments, video interviews, and scheduling exist in separate platforms, your team manually reconciles data across three systems while candidates juggle three different logins.

Native ATS integration means assessment scores automatically update candidate profiles in Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, or Greenhouse. Automated workflows trigger next steps when candidates complete assessments, eliminating manual status updates. Vodafone consolidated 60+ pre-hire assessments and tools through unified platforms, reducing administrative time by 90%.

Verify integration quality by asking current customers about data sync reliability.

Candidate experience and brand impact

Poor candidate experience damages your employer brand and reduces completion rates. When assessment platforms require desktop-only access, lack clear instructions, or feel hostile, candidates abandon the process or accept competitor offers.

Mobile-responsive design with accessibility compliance meeting WCAG 2.2 standards ensures all candidates complete assessments fairly. Preparation resources reduce anxiety by showing candidates what to expect.

Sky achieved 86% assessment completion rates with 90% of candidates finding assessments engaging and 85% appreciating clear instructions.

Pricing models: per-candidate vs. unlimited

Pricing structure fundamentally alters your hiring strategy. Per-candidate pricing (£50-150 per assessment) creates artificial scarcity. When assessing 2,000 contact centre applicants costs £100,000-£300,000 annually, you narrow the funnel to control spend, forcing you back to CV screening for initial filtering.

Unlimited candidates pricing models remove this constraint. Flat annual fees allow you to assess broadly, identifying hidden talent who would never survive CV screening.

Calculate your current spend on assessments (test fees + admin time + vendor contracts) against alternative pricing models to determine your true total cost of ownership.

5 best skill assessment platforms compared

1. Sova Assessment

Best for: UK/EU enterprises running early careers programmes or volume hiring (200-5,000+ annually) who need unified platforms with unlimited pricing and strong compliance credentials.

We combine psychometric assessments, video interviews, and virtual assessment centres in one unified platform. Our unlimited candidates model addresses the economic constraint that forces other platforms to narrow hiring funnels artificially.

Core capabilities

Our assessments cover cognitive ability, personality questionnaires, motivation assessments, situational judgment tests, and skills evaluation across 38 soft skills. The recent Candidate Experience Builder (September 2025) provides WCAG 2.2 accessibility with complete candidate journey customisation.

Video interviews include both one-way recorded and two-way Microsoft Teams integration, allowing you to conduct structured interviews with built-in scoring guidance. Virtual assessment centres handle all administration whether delivered in-person or remotely, with assessors digitally scoring exercises in real-time.

The Integrity Guard feature (launched May 2025) monitors assessment integrity through behavioural pattern analysis rather than invasive webcam proctoring, flagging suspicious activity for human investigation without creating hostile candidate experiences.

Integration and automation:

Native connectors for Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Greenhouse, iCIMS, and SmartRecruiters push assessment scores directly to candidate profiles. Vodafone consolidated 60+ pre-hire assessments and tools into our platform, creating a single source of truth for candidate data.

Compliance and validation:

ISO 27001:2017 certification, GDPR compliance with EU data residency (AWS London/Dublin), and annual adverse impact reporting for high-volume clients (1,000+ assessments) provide the defensibility your Legal team requires. We report validation studies showing moderate to very strong correlations between assessment scores and job performance.

Documented outcomes:

Sky's implementation delivered 69% increase in assessment completion (51% to 86%), 80% uplift in video interview completion (31% to 56%), and 90% candidate satisfaction. Since April 2024, Sky processed 55,975 applications with 29,450 completed assessments, demonstrating the platform scales at volume.

Strengths:

• Unified platform eliminates tool fragmentation (assessments + video + virtual centres in one system)
• Unlimited candidates pricing transforms economics for volume hiring
• Strong UK/EU compliance focus (ISO 27001, GDPR, dedicated CSM model)
• Responsive customer support highly rated by users

Limitations:

• Higher year-one investment (£28,600) makes it less suitable for organisations hiring fewer than 200 annually
• Some users note a learning curve for advanced features
• Occasional technical issues during peak usage periods

"The platform is easy to use and user-friendly for Recruiters, Assessors and Candidates. One of the key benefits is being able to set up your assessment processes through one platform rather than multiple tools and vendors." - Verified user review of Sova

"The system is very agile and one can use it for multiple assessment approaches... Customer support are swift in their response to queries and can resolve any challenges quickly." - Verified user review of Sova

G2 rating: 4.4/5 stars based on 40+ reviews

2. HireVue

Best for: Global enterprises prioritising video interviewing with AI-powered evaluation, particularly North American organisations with existing HireVue relationships.

HireVue built its reputation on video interview technology and expanded into comprehensive assessment. The platform excels at standardising interview evaluation across high volumes through structured templates and AI scoring.

Core capabilities:

The AI video interview system allows candidates to complete interviews remotely using structured question templates. AI algorithms evaluate verbal responses to generate candidate scores. HireVue has addressed previous criticism by removing facial analysis, focusing evaluation on verbal content only.

Assessment modules include cognitive tests, personality questionnaires, and job simulations combined with video interviews. The platform provides integration with major ATS systems including Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle Taleo, and Greenhouse.

Compliance:

HireVue maintains security certifications including SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, and GDPR compliance. The shift away from facial analysis addresses AI compliance concerns.

Pricing:

Annual costs start at $35,000 for mid-sized organisations, rising to $75,000+ for enterprise packages. Per-candidate assessment fees apply on top of platform licences.

Strengths:

• Market-leading video interview technology with established enterprise customer base
• Structured interview templates standardise evaluation across interviewers
• Strong brand recognition simplifies internal stakeholder approval
• Global scale with support infrastructure across regions

Limitations:

• Per-candidate pricing increases costs as hiring volume grows
• AI scoring methodology requires careful legal review for GDPR Article 22 compliance
• Video-first approach may not suit technical positions requiring work samples
• Pricing at premium end for mid-market organisations

G2 rating: 4.8/5 based on recent reviews

3. SHL

Best for: Organisations requiring gold-standard psychometric assessment with extensive validation documentation, particularly those in highly regulated industries.

Core capabilities:

Psychometric test library covers cognitive ability (numerical, verbal, inductive reasoning), personality and behavioural assessment, skills tests, and competency-based evaluation. Assessment content spans 40+ languages with cultural adaptation for international deployment.

Compliance:

ISO/IEC 27001:2013 security certification protects candidate data. SHL is working toward WCAG V2 AA compliance and Section 508 accessibility standards.

Pricing:

Subscription-based model covers specific candidate volumes over 24-month contracts. Enterprise assessment tools can cost tens to hundreds of thousands annually depending on assessment selection and hiring volume.

Strengths:

• Scientific validation with decades of research backing assessment design
• Comprehensive test library covering virtually every role type and competency
• Global recognition simplifies international hiring compliance
• Consultancy support available for custom assessment design

Limitations:

• Per-test pricing becomes prohibitively expensive for volume hiring (500+ candidates)
• Platform delivery feels dated compared to modern unified solutions
• Integration requires custom API work rather than pre-built native connectors
• Assessments sold separately from video interviewing or scheduling tools

G2 rating: 4.3/5 based on 3 reviews

4. Harver

Best for: High-volume retail, hospitality, BPO, and contact centre hiring where speed and candidate throughput matter more than deep psychometric assessment.

Harver focuses on volume hiring efficiency, with the platform designed to reduce time-to-hire and improve retention through fit-based candidate matching in high-turnover environments.

Core capabilities:

Over 450 assessment options including behavioural assessments, cognitive tests, skills evaluation, and work preference matching. The platform emphasises candidate experience optimisation to maintain completion rates in retail environments where annual turnover ranges from 42% to 65%.

Strengths:

• Specialisation in retail, hospitality, and contact centre hiring
• Fast candidate screening reduces recruiter time
• Mobile-first design accommodates hourly workers applying from smartphones

Limitations:

• Less depth in psychometric validation compared to Sova or SHL
• Per-candidate pricing model (exact costs not publicly disclosed)
• Limited suitability for early careers programmes requiring comprehensive assessment

G2 rating: 4.6/5

5. Arctic Shores

Best for: Early careers programmes seeking engaging, game-based assessment appealing to Gen Z candidates while reducing gender and ethnicity bias.

Arctic Shores pioneered neuroscience-based gamified assessment. Each game level replicates laboratory tasks measuring personality and cognitive ability through gameplay mechanics.

Core capabilities:

Behavioural mechanisms required to complete game tasks reveal individual differences in cognitive ability and personality traits. Over 300,000 candidates have completed Arctic Shores assessments in 35+ countries, with high candidate engagement reported across implementations.

Compliance:

Arctic Shores holds ISO 27001 certification for information security management.

Strengths:

• Engaging candidate experience with reported lower stress than traditional tests
• Reduced adverse impact compared to traditional cognitive tests
• Differentiated employer branding through innovative assessment approach

Limitations:

• Gamification may feel inappropriate for senior roles or traditional industries
• Limited track record for technical skills assessment
• Newer validation history compared to established psychometric publishers

Comparison matrix: features, compliance, and cost

Note: Costs shown in native vendor currency. USD figures represent approximately £28,000-£80,000 at current exchange rates.

Building the business case for a unified platform

You need to demonstrate clear return on three fronts to secure CFO approval: direct cost reduction, operational efficiency, and quality improvement.

Direct cost reduction: Calculate your current annual spend: psychometric test licences (£50-150 per candidate), video interviewing subscriptions, assessment centre venue hire, and ATS licences. For 2,000 candidates annually, legacy per-candidate models cost £100,000-£300,000. Unified platforms with unlimited pricing cost £24,000-£60,000 annually, delivering £40,000-£240,000 in direct savings.

Operational efficiency: Your team spends hours weekly on assessment admin (sending invitations, updating statuses, reconciling scores). Documented implementations show 90% reduction in administrative burden, recovering significant productive capacity for strategic work.

Quality improvement: Track first-year retention rates for hires made with and without validated assessment. Research shows cognitive ability tests achieve r=0.51 correlation with performance compared to r=0.18 for CV screening alone. Improved retention from better assessment quality reduces replacement costs significantly.

Implementation timeline: Pre-built assessment libraries enable deployment in 2-4 weeks for standard use cases. Custom competency framework mapping requires 4-8 weeks for organisational psychologists to design tailored assessments.

Risk mitigation: Pilot with one high-volume programme (graduate scheme, retail hiring) before full deployment. Define success metrics: completion rates above 75%, hiring manager confidence scores, candidate satisfaction, and time-to-fill.

Present your business case as total cost of ownership over 36 months, not annual subscription cost. Include the hidden costs of your current approach: poor hires, admin burden, compliance risk, and tool complexity.

Final verdict: Which skill assessment platform fits your hiring strategy?

You face a big choice: continue filtering candidates by credentials and gut-feel interviews, accepting mounting costs from poor retention, legal exposure from indefensible processes, and competitive disadvantage as better-hiring competitors capture the talent you miss. Or adopt validated skill assessment identifying actual capability.

We compared five platforms addressing different organisational needs. Sova provides unified assessment with unlimited pricing for UK/EU volume hiring. HireVue delivers video-first evaluation for global enterprises. SHL maintains scientific validation standards for regulated industries. Harver optimises retail throughput. Arctic Shores differentiates through gamification.

Your decision depends on hiring volume (where pricing models diverge dramatically), compliance requirements (UK/EU enterprises need ISO 27001 and GDPR defensibility), and whether you need a unified platform or can manage multiple specialist tools.

Most enterprise TA teams discover that tool fragmentation creates hidden costs exceeding visible subscription fees. When your team spends 40 hours weekly on assessment administration, the operational burden costs more than the software.

Book a demo with our team to see unified assessments, Workday integration, and unlimited pricing in action.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between psychometric and skills assessment?
Psychometric assessments measure personality traits, cognitive ability, and behavioural preferences using validated psychological instruments. Skills assessments evaluate specific job-related competencies like communication or problem-solving through situational exercises.

How long does assessment platform implementation take?
Pre-built assessment libraries deploy in 2-4 weeks for standard use cases. Custom competency framework mapping requires 4-8 weeks. ATS integration configuration adds 1-2 weeks for data mapping and testing.

Do unlimited candidates pricing models have hidden limits?
Most unlimited models define "fair use" as typical applicant-to-hire ratios. Verify contract terms for your specific volume before signing.

What makes an assessment legally defensible?
Defensible assessments demonstrate job relevance through validation studies showing no disparate impact on protected groups. They use scientifically designed instruments rather than subjective judgment.

How do I calculate ROI for assessment platforms?
Compare current costs (test fees + admin time + poor hire replacement costs) against platform subscription fees plus retention improvement value. Most organisations see positive ROI within 12-18 months through direct cost savings and reduced attrition.

Can candidates cheat on remote assessments?
Modern platforms use behavioural monitoring (browser activity, response patterns, completion times) to flag suspicious activity without invasive proctoring. Situational judgment tests and personality questionnaires resist cheating better than pure knowledge tests.

Key terminology glossary

Adverse impact: Occurs when a selection procedure disproportionately disadvantages candidates from protected groups. The UK Equality Act 2010 requires proving job relevance when adverse impact exists.

Predictive validity: The correlation coefficient between assessment scores and future job performance, typically measured at 6-12 months. Coefficients above r=0.40 indicate strong prediction.

Situational judgment test (SJT): Assessment presenting realistic work scenarios where candidates choose how they would respond. SJTs measure judgment, decision-making, and competency application.

ISO 27001: International standard for information security management systems. Certification demonstrates documented security controls, risk management, and regular audits.

WCAG 2.2: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines ensuring digital content is accessible to people with disabilities. AA conformance represents the legal standard for many jurisdictions.

ATS integration: Technical connection between assessment platforms and applicant tracking systems allowing automated data exchange, candidate status updates, and workflow triggers.

Total cost of ownership (TCO): Comprehensive cost calculation including subscription fees, implementation costs, training time, ongoing support, and hidden operational expenses over 36 months.

‍