Best SeekOut Alternatives: Free and Cheap Sourcing Tools

For Early Careers recruiting, this question exposes a fundamental mismatch. SeekOut excels at finding passive, niche talent who aren't actively looking (think Principal Java Architects with patent portfolios). Graduates? They're actively searching, applying through job boards, and visible on every career platform. You don't need an AI-powered search party to find them. You need a filter to identify which applicants actually have potential.

This guide breaks down free and low-cost alternatives to SeekOut for graduate recruiting, and explains why the smarter budget allocation shifts spend from sourcing tools to assessment platforms that handle volume without per-candidate costs.

Why SeekOut's £15k+ price tag is hard to justify for Early Careers

SeekOut Recruit plans start at $799/month per seat, translating to approximately $9,588 per seat annually. For a team of 5-10 recruiters, you're looking at $47,940 to $95,880 annually (roughly £35,500-£71,000). The average subscription lands around $27,000 per year, though enterprise contracts can exceed $90,000.

You can justify these costs when hunting for candidates with specific, hard-to-find credentials. SeekOut's Intelligent Search goes beyond keywords to surface talent from patents, GitHub contributions, publications, and signals indicating deep expertise. The platform can review over 96 million academic papers and identify researchers invisible on traditional recruiting platforms.

‍

The economic mismatch becomes clear when you calculate cost-per-hire. If SeekOut costs £35,000 annually and contributes to 50 graduate hires, that's £700 per hire just for sourcing. Organic applicants who cost nothing to attract often represent the majority of your Early Careers pipeline anyway.

The "free stack": five zero-cost sourcing methods for graduates

The alternative to expensive sourcing licenses isn't hoping candidates magically appear. You can build a systematic free sourcing approach that generates high-quality graduate candidates without license fees.

Mastering Boolean search and X-Ray on LinkedIn

Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) combined with the site: operator enable candidate searches on specific websites through Google rather than LinkedIn's restricted search. This technique, called X-Ray searching, bypasses LinkedIn's commercial use limits.

Here are two ready-to-use Boolean strings for finding UK graduates:

String 1: Specific university + graduation year

site:uk.linkedin.com/in ("University of Manchester" OR "Manchester University") AND ("graduated 2024" OR "graduated 2025" OR "class of 2024" OR "class of 2025") -intitle:"profiles" -inurl:"dir/"


String 2: Multiple universities + degree type

site:uk.linkedin.com/in (("University College London" OR "UCL" OR "Imperial College") AND ("BSc" OR "BEng" OR "Bachelor") AND ("Computer Science" OR "Software Engineering")) -intitle:"profiles"


These strings combine the site: operator with Boolean logic to replicate many of SeekOut's paid filters at zero cost.

Important limitation: LinkedIn's commercial use limit caps free accounts at roughly 250-350 searches per month based on your activity patterns. This applies only to 2nd and 3rd-degree connections, meaning you can always search among your 1st-degree connections without restrictions. X-Ray searching through Google bypasses these limits entirely, highlighting why volume hiring requires assessment platforms that don't penalise candidate numbers.

Leveraging GitHub and niche communities for tech graduates

For technology roles, GitHub's native search functionality provides free access to developer profiles. You can search users by location, programming languages, follower count (use followers:<10 to identify junior developers), and repository activity.

Navigate to GitHub.com, click "Search," and select "Users" to find developer profiles based on code contributions. Graduate developers often have coursework projects, hackathon submissions, and personal learning repositories that demonstrate potential.

Beyond GitHub, niche communities offer concentrated pools of early-career talent:

1. University career portals: Many universities offer employer registration for job postings
2. Professional associations: Many offer student membership directories
3. Reddit communities: r/cscareerquestions and r/gradcareers have active job-seeking populations

Utilising free aggregators and sourcing tools

Several tools aggregate sourcing capabilities at no cost:

Recruit'em (X-Ray Search Tool)
This online-based SaaS tool allows employers to search candidate profiles on social platforms including LinkedIn, Dribbble, GitHub, Xing, Stack Overflow, and Twitter. Recruit'em X-Ray search is free to use and simplifies Boolean string creation.

Hunter.io (Freemium)
Hunter is a sourcing tool for candidates who are not actively looking for new roles. The platform allows 50 information requests per month for free, supplementing your outreach efforts.

Indeed Job Posting
Indeed offers free job posting with access to basic analytics, and employers can manage applications through their recruiter dashboard. Since graduates actively seek roles, Indeed's free tier captures much of the relevant talent pool.

Budget-friendly alternatives: sourcing tools under £5,000

If fully manual Boolean searching feels unsustainable, several tools offer automation at a fraction of SeekOut's cost.

Low-cost contact finders and extensions

SignalHire
Starts at $39.00 with a free-forever tier available. Provides email and phone number finding with a database of 800+ million profiles. Annual cost for basic usage: approximately £125-£600.

Lusha
Four pricing editions from $0 to $79, with plans starting at $29.90 per user per month. For a 5-user team, this ranges from approximately £1,800 to £4,800 annually, representing significant savings compared to SeekOut's pricing, which can range from roughly £9,500 to £57,000 annually depending on the plan.

ContactOut
Freemium model with email and phone number extraction.

Niche job boards vs. AI sourcing platforms

For graduate recruiting specifically, niche job boards often outperform general AI sourcing tools:

‍

The economics favour niche boards for Early Careers because graduates actively use these platforms. You're not paying to surface hidden candidates but accessing candidates who want to be found.

The hidden cost of "free" sourcing: admin overload and screening bottlenecks

Free sourcing tools come with a significant trade-off: they generate volume without filtering it. If you successfully use Boolean searches to identify 2,000 potential graduate candidates, you face a new problem: who screens 2,000 CVs?

Your team faces this workflow without automated assessment:

1. Source candidates (free, 2-4 hours with Boolean)
2. Screen CVs manually (substantial hours for high-volume applications)
3. Conduct phone screens (hundreds of hours for candidate callbacks)
4. Coordinate assessments (manual test invitations, tracking completions)
5. Update ATS records (entering data across systems)

For high-volume graduate hiring, the "free" sourcing approach quickly becomes expensive in labour costs. Your team spends the majority of time on administration (sending assessment links, chasing incomplete assessments, manually updating ATS records) rather than strategic talent advisory.

CV screening also introduces bias that undermines fair selection. Research suggests that unstructured screening methods demonstrate weak relationships with job performance outcomes, meaning you filter candidates based on signals (university prestige, CV formatting, keyword density) that often don't predict actual job success.

The real cost equation isn't "SeekOut vs. Free Boolean." It's "SeekOut + Manual Screening vs. Free Boolean + Automated Assessment."

Sova vs. SeekOut: moving from "finding" to "selecting" at scale

The strategic insight for Early Careers recruiting: shift budget from discovery to selection. SeekOut charges premium prices for finding people. Graduates aren't hiding though. They're applying to your jobs, visiting your careers page, and responding to job board postings. What organisations need isn't better sourcing but better filtering through skills-based assessment.

How unified assessment replaces expensive pre-screening

Traditional assessment models charge per candidate, creating a perverse incentive. When legacy test publishers charge substantial per-assessment fees, you can't afford to assess all applicants. Instead, you use CV screening to narrow down to a fraction of candidates, potentially filtering out high-potential individuals who lacked prestigious credentials but possessed actual capability.

Sova's unlimited candidates model removes this constraint. The platform scales as you hire more without limits on candidates, enabling assessment of every qualified applicant regardless of volume.

"The platform is easy to use and user-friendly for Recruiters, Assessors and Candidates. One of the key benefits is being able to set up your assessment processes through one platform rather than multiple tools and vendors." - Verified user on G2

The economic comparison becomes clear:

‍

For teams assessing 500+ graduate candidates annually, the unlimited model fundamentally changes the economics. You assess everyone who applies, identify capability through validated instruments, and let the data surface hidden talent that CV screening would have missed.

Administrative efficiency through automation

Nationwide, a major UK financial services organisation, cut manual administration by 90% after implementing Sova's platform. The reduction was particularly significant in customer contact centre and branch hiring where the team was spending substantial time on repetitive tasks.

This efficiency gain addresses the hidden cost of free sourcing. When you eliminate per-candidate assessment fees and automate screening workflows, your team reclaims time for strategic work rather than manual data entry.

"Quick easy access to candidate scoring, Video assessments and past participation data. Customer support when used has generally been very quick and effective in their response." - Jordan H on G2

Sova's video interview capability allows candidates to complete asynchronous video responses, which your team reviews on their schedule rather than coordinating hundreds of phone screens.

"It's an amazing way to review candidate applications and speed up the interviewing process. Allows us to sift through the candidates quickly, rate them and schedule them in for further assessments." - Verified User on G2

Strategic recommendation: the hybrid stack for graduate hiring

Based on the economics and operational realities, here's the recommended approach for Early Careers programs hiring 200-500+ graduates annually:

The recommended stack

‍

For detailed platform capabilities and pricing framework, explore Sova's plans or book a consultation to discuss your specific hiring volume.

When SeekOut still makes sense

SeekOut remains valuable for specific use cases:

1. Senior/executive hiring: When you source passive candidates with specific patent histories, publication records, or deep GitHub contributions
2. Niche technical roles: When the talent pool is genuinely scarce and hidden
3. Diversity sourcing at senior levels: When SeekOut's advanced diversity filters provide unique value for leadership pipelines

Even in these scenarios, Sova's ATS integrations can complement SeekOut by providing the assessment layer that validates whether sourced candidates possess relevant capabilities.

Verdict: building a defensible, low-cost Early Careers funnel

The question isn't whether SeekOut is a good product. It is. The question is whether its capabilities align with your hiring challenge.

For Early Careers recruiting, the challenge is selection, not discovery. Graduates aren't hiding behind obscure GitHub repositories or buried in patent databases. They're actively applying, visible on LinkedIn, and reachable through university partnerships.

The smarter investment shifts budget from expensive discovery tools to robust selection infrastructure:

1. Use free sourcing methods (Boolean, X-Ray, aggregators) to generate candidate volume
2. Pair with unlimited assessment to filter that volume based on actual capability rather than CV keywords
3. Automate administrative workflows so your team focuses on strategic talent decisions

"I really appreciate how Sova's talent assessment platform has helped our organization to streamline our recruitment process and identify the best candidates for our team. The platform's skills testing, psychometric testing, and video interviewing capabilities have been particularly useful." - faraz a. on G2

The result: a defensible, fair hiring process that typically costs significantly less than the SeekOut-centric model while improving candidate quality through validated assessment rather than CV-based guesswork.

Ready to see how unlimited assessment changes the economics of graduate hiring? Book a demo to see how Sova handles high-volume screening for candidates sourced via free channels, or view plans to understand the pricing framework.

Frequently asked questions about SeekOut alternatives

Is there a free version of SeekOut?
No. SeekOut does not offer a free tier. Plans start at $799/month per seat. For free sourcing capabilities, use Boolean search combined with Recruit'em, which provides X-Ray search across LinkedIn, GitHub, and other platforms at no cost.

What is the best free sourcing tool for graduate recruiters?
Recruit'em for X-Ray searching, combined with manual Boolean strings on Google. These methods bypass LinkedIn's commercial use limit of roughly 250-350 searches per month and provide access to graduate profiles at zero cost.

How much does SeekOut actually cost for a small team?
For a 5-10 seat team, expect annual costs between $47,940 and $95,880. The average subscription value is approximately $27,000 per year, though enterprise contracts can exceed $90,000 depending on features and negotiation.

Can free sourcing tools replace SeekOut entirely?
For Early Careers recruiting, yes. Graduates are active job seekers visible through free channels. For senior, passive, or niche technical hiring where candidates have patent histories and deep GitHub portfolios, SeekOut's advanced features provide genuine value that free tools cannot replicate.

What's the hidden cost of using free sourcing tools?
Administrative burden. Free tools generate volume but don't filter it. Screening thousands of CVs manually requires substantial hours and introduces bias. Pairing free sourcing with Sova's unlimited assessment platform solves this problem by automating the filtering process based on validated capabilities rather than subjective CV review.

Key terminology for sourcing and assessment

Boolean search: A method using operators (AND, OR, NOT) to combine or exclude specific keywords in search queries. Example: ("University of Leeds" AND "graduate") NOT "recruiter" finds Leeds graduates while excluding recruiter profiles.

X-Ray search: A technique using the site: operator to search within specific websites via external search engines like Google. Example: site:linkedin.com/in "data analyst" "London" searches LinkedIn profiles through Google, bypassing LinkedIn's search restrictions.

Unified assessment platform: A single software solution combining various candidate evaluation tools (psychometric tests, video interviews, situational judgment tests, assessment centres) into one integrated workflow. Eliminates the need for multiple vendor contracts and manual data reconciliation between systems.

Commercial use limit: LinkedIn's restriction on free account search activity when patterns suggest recruiting or prospecting purposes. Resets on the 1st of each calendar month and applies only to 2nd and 3rd-degree connection searches.